Cases 11 - 20 of 3,281
Soley v. County of Nassau
as 24-880
Plaintiff:
EAN SOLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, NASSAU COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, P.O. OMAR D. GALAN, Shield 3660 and others
RoC Opco LLC v. John Does 1-10
as 1:2024cv02615
Plaintiff:
ROC OPCO LLC d/b/a ROC SKINCARE
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract
Simbaceo, Inc. et al v. Costello et al
as 2:2024cv02510
Plaintiff:
Simbaceo, Inc. and Ocean Seafood Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Costello, Paul Santos, William H. Taylor, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Lotta v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2024cv06194
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Lotta
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Monroe County Sheriff Office, Eric Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alexander v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alexander
Defendant:
Andrerw M. Cuomo, Melissa DeRosa, M.D. Howard A. Zucker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alexander v. Cuomo et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alexander
Defendant:
Andrerw M. Cuomo, Melissa DeRosa, M.D. Howard A. Zucker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rupp v. Younis et al
as 9:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Peter Rupp
Defendant:
ASAT M.J. Younis, SGT R.B. Howard, SGT Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perlman v. General Electric
as 24-514
Plaintiff:
CAROL PERLMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR. and others
Parker v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, Inc.
as 24-688
Plaintiff:
MARIAN E. PARKER
Defendant:
ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORK, INC. and JOHN DOE 1-10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
