Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Duncan v. Bartow County et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
James John Duncan, Jr.
Defendant:
Bartow County, Clark Millsap, Correcthealth Bartow, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
John Fordham v. Georgia Department of Administrative Services, et al
as 23-11214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DUNCAN FORDHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Fordham v. Georgia Department of Administrative Services et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
John Duncan Fordham
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Administrative Services and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32228
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNCAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29521
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNCAN CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23710
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Fordham v. USA
as 12-10948
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DUNCAN FORDHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fordham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00088
Petitioner:
John Duncan Fordham
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Duncan v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00661
Plaintiff:
John Duncan
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Sylvester Nettles, Micheal McCranny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Cummings (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00634
Plaintiff:
John Duncan
Defendant:
John Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
