Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Dinwiddie v. Evans
as 3:2008cv00689
Petitioner:
Steve Dinwiddie
Respondent:
John Evans
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. Evans et al
as 3:2008cv00663
Petitioner:
Kevin Edwards
Respondent:
John Evans and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steve Dinwiddie v. John Evans
as 08-3266
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE DINWIDDIE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden
Ambrose et al v. Central Management Services et al
as 3:2008cv00533
Plaintiff:
Richard Ambrose, David Tiffany, Michael Cramer and others
Defendant:
Central Management Services, Roger Walker, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dinwiddie v. Evans et al
as 3:2008cv00458
Petitioner:
Steve Dinwiddie
Respondent:
John Evans and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee Parker v. John Evans
as 08-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE H. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, JOHN EVANS, Warden, COLLEEN A. RENNISON and others
FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION v. CT ACQUISITION CORP. et al
as 1:2008cv00531
Plaintiff:
FRONTIER INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION
Defendant:
CT ACQUISITION CORP., JOHN EVANS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., J. ROE HITCHCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Enrico Levy v. John Evans, et al
as 08-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRICO LEVY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden, State of Illinois Dept. of Corrections Pinckneyville, STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director
Hill v. Evans et al
as 1:2008cv01178
Petitioner:
Henry C. Hill
Respondent:
John Evans, Roger Walker, Mike Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enoch Wilder v. Rick Sutton, et al
as 08-1692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENOCH WILDER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK SUTTON, Chaplain, JULIUS FLAGG, MARK A. PIERSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
