Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Eng v. McDonald
as 1:2017cv10502
Petitioner:
Yoeun Eng
Respondent:
Joseph D. McDonald , Steven W. Tompkins , Chris Cronen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Acheampong v. Hassell, et al
as 4:2017cv00434
Petitioner:
Richmond Acheampong
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Scott Sutterfield , U S Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01433
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv01878
Plaintiff:
Shun Qing Chen
Defendant:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jane Doe, et al v. John Kelly, et al
as 17-15383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANE DOE, # 1, JANE DOE, # 2 and NORLAN FLORES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, RONALD VITIELLO, Chief, United States Border Patrol and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
