Cases 1 - 10 of 23
HART v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JONATHAN CZYZEWSKI, Robert Pinkney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HART v. PARKINSON
as 2:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HART v. ANGELUCCI
as 2:2021cv05085
Petitioner:
JOHN HART
Respondent:
STEPHEN ANGELUCCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VILLARE v. LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 5:2019cv02227
Defendant:
JOHN HART and LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. VILLARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HART v. COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04402
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
JOHN HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HART v. DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv04153
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY and MICHAEL GALANTINO
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE et al
as 2:2017cv05762
Petitioner:
JOHN HART
Respondent:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HART v. TARRANT et al
as 2:2017cv05055
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
THOMAS TARRANT and KIMBERLY ANN MACKEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
HART v. GORDON et al
as 2:2014cv03097
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
KATHRYN GORDON, JOHN P. O'NEIL, BRIAN DEHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
