Cases 1 - 10 of 17
HAYWARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
JERALD JOHN HAYWARD, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Hayward v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11087
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN HAYWARD
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Joner et al v. IBI Armored Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Joseph Joner, Allen Suber, Jr., Endy Gabriel Peralta and others
Defendant:
IBI Armored Services, Inc., Michael Shields and Harold Shields
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hayward v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
as 1:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
John Hayward
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hayward v. The Matworks Co LLC et al
as 1:2020cv07183
Plaintiff:
John Hayward
Defendant:
Diversey Inc and The Matworks Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Sanders v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 19-1861
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Defendant:
RAYVON IRBY, JOHN HAYWARD, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ALAN SANDERS
Hayward v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2019cv00479
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
John Hayward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayward v. United States of America
as 18-1174
Petitioner - Appellant:
John Hayward
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
