Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DIRIG v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2021cv01358
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM HYATTE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez, Gabriel v. State of Wisconsin, Dane County et al
as 3:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Deputy Zachary A. Sween, Deputy Lacey M. Kranski, B. Wiersma and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel G. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRIG v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2017cv02195
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Defendant:
G. EABS, JOHN/JANE DOE(S), KATIE KENNAMEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIRIG v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02812
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. DIRIG, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE(S) and THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew, Rex v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2014cv00565
Petitioner:
Rex Alvin Drew
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin , Sauk County, Chip Meisters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hammersley, Robert v. DeLap, Barbara et al
as 3:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Robert Hammersley
Defendant:
Barbara DeLap , William Flanagan , David Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Leiser, Loren v. Voeks, Jeannie et al
as 3:2011cv00328
Plaintiff:
Loren L. Leiser, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeannie Ann Voeks , Brian J. Bohlmann , Kenneth Adler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FURROW v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00190
Defendant:
R. CROOKS, JOHN/JANE DOE(S), CASE MANAGER B. ENGLISH and others
Plaintiff:
BUFORD O'NEAL FURROW, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
