Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
USA v. John Bravata
as 26-1574
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN JOSEPH BRAVATA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02524
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dausner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026at01524
Plaintiff: John Joseph Dausner
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
(SS)Dausner v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv02183
Plaintiff: John Joseph Dausner
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Joseph v. Brittingham et al
as 1:2026cv01105
Petitioner: John Joseph
Respondent: Monica Brittingham and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeSantis v. Curci et al
as 3:2026cv00076
Plaintiff: Tyler Arthur DeSantis
Defendant: Alice Curci, Travis C. Atkinson, John Joseph Zelinksy, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Jean Dominique Morancy
as 26-10478
Petitioner: In re: JEAN DOMINIQUE MORANCY and L.M.
Respondent: SABRINA ALEX SALOMON, GERALD FRANCIS ZNOSKO, ANGELA LAMBIASE and others
Cummings v. Perkins, et al.
as 26-741
Petitioner: CLAYTON EVAN CUMMINGS
Respondent: JEFFEREY PERKINS, BOB FERGUSON, NICK BROWN and others
Sidor v. Thornell, et al.
as 26-39
Petitioner: JOHN JOSEPH SIDOR
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Fritz et al v. Iran and China Investment Development Group
as 1:2025cv07093
Plaintiff: Noala Fritz, Terry Abbott, John Robert Allman and others
Defendant: Iran and China Investment Development Group d/b/a Lubian.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?