Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Beran v. WorldTelemetry Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00185
Plaintiff:
Callen Beran
Defendant:
WorldTelemetry Inc , John Lee , Casey Zandbergen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Alford et al
as 1:2009cv00030
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Plaintiff:
John Lee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cook v. State of Texas
as 7:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Lee. Cook
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bullard et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
John G. Alexander, Clarence Edward Batts, Sr., Elnora Bell and others
Defendant:
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Dow Chemical Company, Koppers Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02454
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Green v. Womble et al
as 1:2007cv00471
Plaintiff:
Macee Dion Green
Defendant:
John Womble, Davis Doughty, John Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
John Lee
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc and Hosto & Buchan PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beaudion v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas et al
as 2:2007cv00117
Plaintiff:
John Lee Beaudion, II
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Charla Hemerly, Kirby Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co et al v. Lee
as 3:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co and others
Defendant:
John Lee and Hye Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
