Cases 1 - 10 of 17
John Simmons v. USA
as 21-11455
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN WALTER SIMMONS
Bell v. US
as 21-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESUS GAMEZ, PHILIP JONES, FRANCISCO PEREZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
John Bellamy, Jr. v. Daniel Calhoun, Jr.
as 20-6195
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, F. SHILLING, Director of Health Services, MS. MINTER, Nurse Practitioner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WALTER BELLAMY, JR.
Bell v. US
as 20-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD BENAVIDES, FRANCISCO PEREZ, MELITON CORDERO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
John Walters v. Michael Martin
as 19-7391
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
Respondent:
JOHN T. MURPHY
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN WALTERS
In re: John Simmons
as 19-12750
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN WALTER SIMMONS
John Gold v. United States Trustee, et al
as 16-3949
Appellant:
JOHN WALTER GOLD
Appellee:
WALDEMAR J. WOJCIK, Trustee and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
USA v. John Simmons
as 16-14700
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WALTER SIMMONS
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nationwide Automated Systems Inc et al
as 2:2014cv07249
Defendant:
Joel Gillis, Oasis Studio Rentals #3 LLC, Nationwide Automated Systems Inc and others
Interested Party:
Michael Beresford, Barbara Ortwein, H. Gilbert Jones and others
Undetermined:
William Hoffman and Creditors
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Petitioner:
Robert Nairn and Piruz Khorvash
Other:
ALEJANDRO "ALEX" TREJO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
US v. John Trala
as 14-4308
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WALTER TRALA, a/k/a Sonny, a/k/a Walter John Trala
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
