Cases 1 - 10 of 331
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Marsh et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dorsey
Defendant:
Dr. Marsh, John Wetzel, Sgt. Lefvere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Franklin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Vincent Franklin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kevin Kauffman and L. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Brittain et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
K. Brittain, John Wetzel, N. Wynder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moton v. Garman et al
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Defendant:
Mr. Garman, Deputy Houser, Mr. Vangorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ransom et al
as 1:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
John Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, J. Eyer, Dr. Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARMER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv01852
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. HARMER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Staats v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv01962
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Staats
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Claire DeMatteis, Jayme Gravell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
