Cases 41 - 50 of 850
Staats v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Staats
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Claire DeMatteis, Jayme Gravell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TREADWAY, JR. v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv01583
Petitioner:
PETER ALLAN TREADWAY, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and WEST CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHLAGER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
DAMIEN M. SCHLAGER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ULLI KLEMM, SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATCHELOR v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01340
Plaintiff:
STEFAN BATCHELOR
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE and FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2022cv01190
Plaintiff:
Shamel Jones
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JOHN WETZEL and GEORGE LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Mason et al
as 1:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Tariq Wyatt
Defendant:
Superintendent Mason, L. Cronauer, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FELTON v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2022cv01014
Petitioner:
STEVEN FELTON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Shamel Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel and George Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Spyker et al
as 1:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Knight
Defendant:
Jill Spyker, Sgt. Reihart, John Papotto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
