Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70035
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70016
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 22-16855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2022cv05066
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas DeCola v. Jon E. DeGuilio
as 20-3443
Interested Party:
DAVE PEARMAN, FREDDIE BAKER, KAY GUDEMAN and others
Respondent:
JON E. DEGUILIO
Petitioner:
THOMAS DECOLA
Mason v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2020cv00739
Plaintiff:
Michael Mason and Michael Robin Mason
Defendant:
United States District Court and Jon E DeGuilio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2019cv00828
Plaintiff:
James Demarco Bogan and J Bogan-Bey
Defendant:
Micha P Cox, Jon E DeGuilio, Kenneth P Cotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3827
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
