Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Watanabe v. Jones Day et al.
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Tetsunori Watanabe
Defendant:
Jones Day and Yuichiro Mori
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JONES DAY v. VIZIO, INC.
as 1:2012cv01947
Plaintiff:
JONES DAY
Defendant:
VIZIO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In Re: Subpoena Duces Tecum on Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
as 6:2012cv02158
Plaintiff:
JPS Elastomerics Corporation and JPS Industries Inc
Defendant:
Jones Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Subpoena Duces Tecum on Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06087
Plaintiff:
JPS Elastomerics Corporation and JPS Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Jones Day
In Re:
Subpoena Duces Tecum on Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
JPS Elastomerics Corporation et al v. Jones Day
as 6:2011cv02960
Plaintiff:
JPS Elastomerics Corporation and JPS Industries Inc
Defendant:
Jones Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stough v. UNUM Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2009cv04169
Plaintiff:
Lydia Stough
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company and Jones Day Employee Benfit Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Hampton-Stein v. Erwin I. Katz, Ltd. et al
as 9:2009cv80798
Plaintiff:
Tracey Hampton-Stein
Defendant:
Erwin I. Katz, Ltd., Erwin I. Katz, Ltd., Erwin I. Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JONES DAY v. SCRUSHY
as 1:2006cv00466
Plaintiff:
JONES DAY and JONES DAY
Defendant:
RICHARD M. SCRUSHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
City of Rome, Georgia et al v. Hotels.Com, L. P. et al
as 4:2005cv00249
Defendant:
Travelport, Inc., Hotels.Com GP. LLC, Travelnow.Com, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City of Rome, Georgia, City of Hartwell, City of Dalton and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jones Day
Intervenor:
State Revenue Comm Bart L Graham
Intervenor Defendant:
IAC/InterActiveCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
