Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rogers v. California Department of Public Health et al
as 3:2026cv06495
Plaintiff:
Jackie Rogers
Defendant:
California Department of Public Health, Jorge Palacios and Charlet Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Palacios v. Unknown
as 2:2025cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jorge Palacios
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palacios
as 3:2024cv08775
Plaintiff:
Jorge Palacios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michelle Cox v. Ryan Lewis, et al
as 23-15963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE COX, Individually, and as parent and next friend of M.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN LEWIS, individually, and in his official capacity, JORGE PALACIOS, individually, and in his official capacity and CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Clifton Pleasant, Jr. v. Humberto Miranda, et al
as 21-55784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON PLEASANT, Jr., an individual and successor-in-interest of Clifton Pleasant, Sr., deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
HUMBERTO MIRANDA, TARRON BROADWAY, UNKNOWN DEPUTIES, individuals and others
Jorge Palacios v. Kevin Smith, et al
as 20-17233
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN SMITH and EVALYN HOROWITZ
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE PALACIOS
PALACIOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98420
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE PALACIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. Lewis et al
as 2:2020cv01792
Defendant:
Clark County School District, Jorge Palacios and Ryan Lewis
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cox and M. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palacios vs. Smith, et al.
as 2:2017cv02500
Plaintiff:
Jorge Palacios
Defendant:
Kevin Smith and Evalyn Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palacios -v- Smith, et al
as 3:2017cv06071
Plaintiff:
Jorge Palacios
Defendant:
Kevin Smith and Evalyn Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
