Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Torres v. Zarchi, et al
as 19-1810
Plaintiff:
L.V.T.R., Y.Y.T.R., N.Y.T.R. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MENDEL ZARCHI, CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF PUERTO RICO and ANTONIO SILVA DELGADO, a/k/a Tonito
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE TORRES
Ahern, et al v. O'Keefe, et al
as 14-2329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD AHERN, KAI KUNZ and WILLIAM XI PROPERTIES SERIES, LLC
Defendant:
ANTHONY JOSEPH SCOLA, RONALD MCQUINN, KELLER WILLIAMS NORTH CENTRAL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLE O'KEEFE, DANIEL LORING, MARK KAVANACH and others
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2014cv01890
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cruz-Acosta, Gil Cruz-Acosta, Pedro Cruz-Santiago and others
Defendant:
Exelis Systems Corporation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Cruz Acosta et al v. Exelis Systems Corporation, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01891
Defendant:
Exelis Systems Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cruz-Acosta , Gil Cruz-Acosta , Pedro Cruz-Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Urbani et al v. Wellesley College
as 1:2013cv11768
Plaintiff:
Frank Urbani , Derek Everett , Richard Palumbo and others
Defendant:
Wellesley College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ahern et al v. Scola et al
as 4:2012cv40096
Plaintiff:
Edward Ahern and Kai Kunz
Defendant:
Anthony Scola, Sheila McQuinn, Ronald McQuinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
US v. Cepeda
as 09-2348
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DOMINGO CEPEDA, a/k/a Jorge Torres
PPV Connection, Inc. v. Aguirre-Calderon et al
as 3:2007cv01261
Plaintiff:
PPV Connection, Inc.
Defendant:
Luzmarie Aguirre-Calderon, John Doe, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
