Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GONZALEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv03446
Petitioner:
JOSE M. GONZALEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ROBERT CHETERKIN, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. SCI-Forest et al
as 4:2022cv01237
Petitioner:
Jose L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Forest and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2021cv02453
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2019cv03124
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez v. PA Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2014cv02326
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Gonzalez
Respondent:
PA Board of Probation and Parole and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez-Longoria v. FBOP
as 1:2014cv00954
Petitioner:
Jose L Gonzalez-Longoria
Respondent:
FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2014cv00887
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau (of) Prisons and J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2014cv01832
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and J.E. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ v. PRIMECARE, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv02238
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
PRIMECARE, INC., LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, PAUL SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. PAROLE SUPERVISOR
as 3:2007cv00275
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
PAROLE SUPERVISOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
