Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Gonzalez Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-2329
Petitioner:
JOSE ROLANDO GONZALEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre
as 2:2024cv00810
Petitioner:
Jose A. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. St. Andre
as 4:2024cv00728
Petitioner:
Jose A. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US Capital Global Partners LLC v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2023cv06603
Plaintiff:
US Capital Global Partners LLC
Defendant:
Jose Alberto Gonzalez, Vantage Bank Texas and West Retail Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Columbia Legal Services, et al. v. Stemilt AG Services, LLC
as 23-3548
Plaintiff:
MARGARITO FIERRO CORDERO, FERNANDO MENDEZ FRANCO, JOSE RODRIGUEZ LLERENAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEMILT AG SERVICES, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
COLUMBIA LEGAL SERVICES, counsel for plaintiffs
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, Eduardo Tomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivas Gonzalez v. Garland
as 21-637
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE JOSE RIVAS GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-1188
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
