Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Juan Ontanon-Espinoza
as 20-11093
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Jose Ontanon-Espinoza
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Level 3 Communications, LLC et al v. Boretex Communication LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03124
Plaintiff:
WilTel Communications, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Jose G. Espinoza Jose G. Espinoza d/b/a Boretex Communication, Boretex Communication LLC and Jose G. Espinoza doing business as Boretex Communication
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16674
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, STEPHANIE R.C. KANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16537
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C., LLG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
United States v. Jose Espinoza, Jr.
as 20-2354
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Luis Espinoza, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
ESPINOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45627
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERIBERTO ESPINOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberto Amaya-Palacios v. William Barr
as 20-71883
Petitioner:
ROBERTO AMAYA-PALACIOS, AKA Roberto Amaya, AKA Roberto Amya, AKA Jose M. Espinoza, AKA Roberto Palacios Amaya
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Uphoff v. Cota-Espinoza et al
as 6:2020cv01170
Defendant:
Jose Cota-Espinoza and MJC Corp
Plaintiff:
Melvin Uphoff, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
