Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Espinoza v. Clinton et al
as 1:2023cv12606
Plaintiff:
Jose David Espinoza
Defendant:
Hillary Rodman Clinton, William G. Young, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02840
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00663
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Espinoza v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Jose A. Espinoza
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Espinoza v. Department of Defense, et al
as 23-1103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE DAVID ESPINOZA
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, BAE SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Espinoza v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2022cv11819
Plaintiff:
Jose David Espinoza
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, BAE Systems North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Espinoza v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Jose Villalon Espinoza
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
