Cases 1 - 10 of 130
USA v. Christian Landeros Mendez
as 24-11102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN JOSE LANDEROS MENDEZ
Kelly v. First NBC Bank
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Russell Kelly
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Company as Receiver for First NBC Bank, Jose Carlos Mendez, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Lee v. Guayara et al
as 0:2023cv62362
Plaintiff:
Bernice C Lee and Bernice Lee
Defendant:
Bryant Guayara, DaVibezCreations LLC, M5 Store LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Jose Mendez-Guevara v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2291
Petitioner:
JOSE ARCIDES MENDEZ-GUEVARA, CLELIA ARACELY RIVERA-RAMIREZ, JOSE FERNANDO MENDEZ-RIVERA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jose Mendez-Guevara v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1716
Petitioner:
JOSE ARCIDES MENDEZ-GUEVARA, CLELIA ARACELY RIVERA-RAMIREZ, JOSE FERNANDO MENDEZ-RIVERA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Contreras et al v. Timinelli et al
as 2:2023cv03531
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Contreras, Jose A. Mendez and Wilfredo Juarez
Defendant:
Peter Timinelli and Pete Timinelli Landsaping, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
USA v. Jose Mendez
as 23-10885
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL MENDEZ
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
JOSE ALBERTO MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MENDEZ REYES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS MENDEZ REYES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03095
Petitioner:
Jose Guillermo Mendez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
