Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Phillip Okin v. AT&T Corp, et al
as 21-2469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP OKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T CORP, JUDGE JOSE L LINARES, JUDGE SUSAN D WIGENTON and others
OKIN v. AT&T CORP. et al
as 3:2021cv12651
Defendant:
AT&T CORP., JUDGE SUSAN D. WIGENTON, JUDGE ESTER SALAS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP OKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OKIN v. AT&T CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv12651
Defendant:
AT&T CORP., Judge Susan D Wigenton, Judge Stanley R Chesler and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP OKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawrence Crawford, et al v. Jose Linares
as 21-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YAHYA MUQUIT and LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JOSE L LINARES
RADIN v. LINARES
as 3:2018cv09956
Plaintiff:
LIDYA RADIN
Defendant:
JOSE L. LINARES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BK TRUCKING CO. et al v. PACCAR ENGINE COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv02282
Defendant:
PACCAR ENGINE COMPANY, KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY, PETERBUILT MOTORS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
BK TRUCKING CO, BK TRUCKING CO. and SANTELLI TRUCKING, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
JOSE L. LINARES
Consolidated Plaintiff:
HEAVY WEIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. and RUSTY DANIEL TRUCKING, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In re: Paul Bultmeyer
as 15-1321
Petitioner:
In re: PAUL BULTMEYER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JOSE L LINARES
In re: Jose Katz
as 14-4836
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOSE KATZ
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JOSE L LINARES
In re: Jose Katz
as 14-4438
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JOSE KATZ
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOSE L LINARES
Toni Clark v. Jose Linares, et al
as 14-3647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONI CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE L LINARES, Judge, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, Chief Judge and ANDREA WALKER, Deputy-In-Charge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
