Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
ROBERTS v. OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL et al
as 1:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
MARK J ROBERTS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL and JOSEPH E THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shachter v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05504
Defendant:
Joseph A. Thomas, City Of Chicago, Kelley A. Gandurski and others
Plaintiff:
Jay F. Shachter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-35801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edward Wilcox v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 15-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD WILCOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD , MI, BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
Edward Wilcox v. City of Southfield, et al
as 14-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD WILCOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, BRENDA L. LAWRENCE, JOSEPH E. THOMAS, JR. and others
Thomas v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review et al
as 4:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Thomas
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review, Social Security Hearing and Appeals and L. Ellis Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Suessmith Jr. et al
as 4:2012cv00228
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Thomas
Defendant:
Donald C. Suessmith Jr., Chandler, LLC, Household Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Southfield, City of et al
as 5:2011cv14909
Plaintiff:
Toby Jacob Rhodes
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, B Weeks, S Biggens and others
Wilcox v. Southfield, City of et al
as 2:2011cv11349
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilcox
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, Brenda Lawrence, Joseph E Thomas, Jr and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
