Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MASCAL v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MASCAL
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LONG CREEK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DISABILITY RIGHTS MAINE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00478
Defendant:
JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS MAINE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
SMITH v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SMITH
Defendant:
SHAWN D GILLEN and JOSEPH FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. LONG CREEK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER et al
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
SADIYA ALI
Defendant:
LONG CREEK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAVERDIERE v. BALCOM et al
as 2:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
IRIS LAVERDIERE
Defendant:
MICHAEL BALCOM, SR, AMANDA WOOLFORD , JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. DALL-LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
BRIDGET PARKER
Defendant:
JOSH DALL-LEIGHTON, SCOTT LANDRY , RENEE SHANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JAMES v. BUENO et al
as 1:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL J JAMES
Defendant:
ERIC BUENO, RANDALL LIBERTY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE et al v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
RIKKI LYNN WHITE
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY , PENOBSCOT COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT , TROY MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
