Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JOHNSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv03062
Defendant:
BARRY FREUNDELL, JIMMIE ALLEN, JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
DUANE JOSEPH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HOLLADAY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv00915
Plaintiff:
MARK J. PRATT, BRAD LEE SCHWARZ, SONJA RUHREN and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY and others
Interested Party:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ALLAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. ALLAN , VICTOR AMBURGY , JUDY COX BARKELY and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv00578
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITRUS WORLD, INC.
as 1:2012cv00818
Plaintiff:
DUANE JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITRUS WORLD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. QUAKER OATS COMPANY
as 1:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
DUANE JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
QUAKER OATS COMPANY
Movant:
DOUGLAS WARDRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01075
Plaintiff:
DUANE JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ADRIAN M. FENTY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
JOHNSON v. MCCOOL
as 1:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
DUANE JOSEPH JOHNSON
Defendant:
STEPHEN J. MCCOOL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
JOHNSON v. DUNCAN et al
as 1:2010cv01171
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
ARNE DUNCAN and ACS EDUCATION SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
