Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Laurensau v. Estock et al
as 1:2020cv01978
Petitioner:
Joseph Laurensau
Respondent:
Lee J. Estock, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Josh Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph LaurensauIn re: Joseph Laurensau
as 20-3118
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH LAURENSAU
LAURENSAU v. WENEROWICS et al
as 2:2013cv06030
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICS, EDWARD A. NEIDERHISER, ROMIROWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Laurensau v. Charles Pluck, et al
as 13-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PLUCK, CO I, RONALD YOURKIN, LYLE POZIVIAK, CO I and others
Joseph Laurensau v. Louis Folino
as 13-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
CRAIG HAYWOOD, FRANK, J. MATTHEWS and others
Joseph Laurensau v. Samuel Romarowics, et al
as 13-1283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL ROMAROWICS, CO III, BARKLEY, CO 1 Property SMU, VINCENT KNIZER, CO II and others
LAURENSAU v. PLUCK et al
as 2:2012cv00623
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant:
CHARLES PLUCK, YOURKINS, LYLE POZIVIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAURENSAU vs. ROMAROWICS et al
as 2:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant:
SAMUEL ROMAROWICS, COIII, BARKLEY, CO 1, VINCENT KNIZER, COII and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAURENSAU v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAURENSAU
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, CRAIG HAYWOOD, MR. FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPADY et al v. BEARD et al
as 2:2008cv01599
Plaintiff:
DEVIN X. SPADY, JOSEPH LAURENSAU, EVOL YOUNG and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN D. SCHAFFER, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
