Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bernice Conley et al v. Joseph R. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv07878
Plaintiff:
Bernice Conley
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
President of the US Joseph R. Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bernice Conley v. Joseph R. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv07890
Plaintiff:
Bernice Conley
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hrair Kaladjian v. Joseph R. Biden et al
as 5:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Hrair Kaladjian
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., U.S. Department of State, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Melissa Lee et al v. Paul Hargrove et al
as 2:2013cv00026
Defendant:
TSgt Luis Armis, Major General David S Baldwin, Captain Ryan Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lee
Azael Dythian Perales v. Orange County Sheriffs Department et al
as 8:2011cv00824
Respondent:
Don Bankhead, Patricia C Bates, Ben S Bernanke and others
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales et al v. Dollar Tree Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01772
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Alice M Batchelder, Ben S Bernanke and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Steve Edwards and Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2010cv01472
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Ben S Bernanke, Joseph R Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Azael Dythian Perales v. United States of America et al
as 8:2010cv01250
Defendant:
Don Bankhead, Ben S Bernanke, Joseph R Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Congress, et al
as 2:2003cv00804
Plaintiff:
Parviz Karim-Panahi
Defendant:
Congress, Judiciary/Judges/Attorneys, Government of USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
