Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Rowan Riggs S.A.R.L. et al
as 4:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johnson
Defendant:
Rowan Riggs S.A.R.L., Valaris plc, Valaris Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Zerie v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv02003
Petitioner:
Uqbasilassie Kiflemarieam Zerie
Respondent:
Jimmy Johnson, Joshua Johnson and Alehandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv04086
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johnson
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Comuster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00294
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
U.S. Bank, National Association, As Trustee v. Johnson et al
as 6:2019cv00032
Defendant:
Joshua Johnson and Michelle Johnson
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association, As Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. National Association, as Trustee v. Johnson et al
as 6:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
U.S. National Association, as Trustee
Defendant:
Joshua Johnson and Michelle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins-Laster v. Openroad Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00120
Defendant:
James Franklin Askew, Joshua Johnson and Openroad Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gina Collins-Laster
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Thomas v. Cada et al
as 4:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Thomas
Defendant:
Chad Cada , Douglas Ritter, Joshua Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Cada et al
as 4:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Thomas
Defendant:
Chad Cada , Douglas Ritter, Joshua Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
