Cases 1 - 10 of 363
M&T Bank v. Chryssoula Arsenis, et al
as 24-1723
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK, other Hudson City Savings Bank
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
John Morris Anderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
MANDAL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
SMRITIMAY MANDAL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $22,190.07 IN FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NO. XXXXXX595 HELD IN THE NAMES OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AND ANTHONY M.PALMER
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$22,190.07 IN FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NO. XXXXXX595 HELD IN THE NAMES OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AND ANTHONY M.PALMER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
WALLACE v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2023cv23170
Plaintiff:
SHYAN LACHEL WALLACE
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Keith SequeiraIn re: Keith Sequeira
as 23-3262
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH P. SEQUEIRA and HELEN D. SEQUEIRA
Respondent:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO and GEORGETTE CASTNER
Not Classified By Court:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, I. MARK COHEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
