Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Kay v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Susan Kay
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 e Preauthorized transfers
Haun v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haun
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
USA v. $396,172.61 (U.S.) From Four (4) JP Morgan Chase Bank Accounts et al
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$396,172.61(US) from four JP Morgan Chase Bank Accounts, All Funds contained within six Charles Schwab Brokerage Accounts, One 2022 Tesla Model Y and others
Claimant:
Nicole S. Randall
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Harris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jonathan Armand Harris
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Leah Lucas, Russell S. Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dennis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 3:2020cv02267
Plaintiff:
Dwayne J. Dennis and Hazel R.D. Dennis
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haun v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2020cv02044
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Does 1 to 50 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Haun
as 6:2020cv00390
Defendant:
Linda Haun
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Heib et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 6:2019cv00399
Plaintiff:
Teresa Heib and Dwight Heib
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Wilson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 3:2018cv02209
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Sue Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
