Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hephzibah Dollar v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv01173
Defendant:
AIG, Aetna, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Hephzibah Dollar
Garcia v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 2:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
Ernest Garcia
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Omry Reznik et al
as 2:2015cv06590
Defendant:
Does and Omry Reznik
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cobb v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv01955
Plaintiff:
Jason Cobb
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Alfred Altamirano, Ellen Altamirano and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Christopher Ellington v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 13-15692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ELLINGTON, AKA Christopher M. Ellington
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General, BRADLEY M. SOOS, Judge, ROBERT CARTER OLSON, Judge and others
Ellington v. Horne et al
as 2:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Ellington
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne, Bradley M Soos, Robert Carter Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Chavez et al
as 5:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Rito Chavez, Raquel Chavez, Silvia Calado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coates v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 2:2012cv00590
Plaintiff:
Norticia Jeanette Coates
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pinedo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 2:2011cv01116
Plaintiff:
Juan Pinedo
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geist et al v. California Reconveyance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
John C. Geist and Becky Parker Geist
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
