Cases 1 - 10 of 23
United States of America v. Bonilla (Nolasco)
as 21-1258
Defendant:
Domingo Fernandez, Emmanuel Tavarez, Juan Bonilla, AKA A.D.A. Pinto and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nelson Nolasco, AKA Menor, AKA Angel Soto-Caban
Zamora v. McFadden
as 3:2021cv00116
Respondent:
Gary McFadden
Petitioner:
Juan Espinal Zamora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Espinal v. United States of America
as 20-782
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Espinal
Espinal v. United States of America
as 20-767
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Espinal
Espinal v. United States of America
as 20-781
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Espinal
Espinal v. USA
as 1:2019cv06522
Petitioner:
Juan Espinal
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ESPINAL v. HUDSON NEWS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC
as 2:2016cv00354
Plaintiff:
JUAN ESPINAL
Defendant:
HUDSON NEWS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Bonilla (Rodriguez)
as 15-3699
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Bonilla, AKA A.D.A. Pinto, Yoel Pichardo, AKA Yoel Alberto Pichardo Gonzalez, AKA Yoel Alberto Gonzalez Pichardo, Nassir Mateo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Marcos Rodriguez, AKA Markito
Martinez v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv04726
Petitioner:
Juan Espinal Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Bonilla (Martinez)
as 14-2759
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Bonilla, AKA A.D.A. Pinto, Yoel Pichardo, AKA Yoel Alberto Pichardo Gonzalez, AKA Yoel Alberto Gonzalez Pichardo, Nassir Mateo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Randall Martinez, AKA Randall, AKA Jose Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
