Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv01735
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
RODRIGUEZ v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv00768
Petitioner:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
RODRIGUEZ v. MAY et al
as 2:2016cv05353
Petitioner:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHESTER COUNTY and BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOYER v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 5:2015cv06232
Plaintiff:
CAROL A. MOYER
Defendant:
JUAN RODRIGUEZ , CRYSTAL BEVERAGE CORPORATION , RYDER SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2015cv01960
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ferguson, Bopp and Dancha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA et al v. RYAN
as 2:2014cv04032
Plaintiff:
GIOCONDA GARCIA and JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DEBRA RYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ et al v. THE SCOTTS COMPANY
as 2:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
ARTURO HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ , JUAN RODRIGUEZ , BARRY WARREN and others
Defendant:
THE SCOTTS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GARCIA et al v. BROCK-WEINSTEIN et al
as 2:2013cv07487
Plaintiff:
GIOCONDA GARCIA and JUAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KIMBERLY BROCK-WEINSTEIN, MARIANE DUNFEE, EAN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
