Cases 41 - 50 of 53
USA v. Pedro Esparza-Diaz
as 10-2415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO ESPARZA-DIAZ, AKA Juan Diaz Osegera, AKA Juan Esparza-Diaz, AKA Juan Trujillo, AKA Juan Sanchez
Paulino Granda v. Major Amion, et al
as 10-90013
Petitioner:
PAULINO GRANDA
Respondent:
MAJOR RICHARD D. AMION, of Miami-Dade County Police Department, ROBBERY BUREAU, Street Terror Offender Program, in their official and individual capacities, DETECTIVE ROBERT CHRISTIE and others
USA v. Juan Sanchez-Godoy
as 10-40265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN SANCHEZ-GODOY
MEDINA et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00093
Petitioner:
ABIGAIL MEDINA and JUAN SANCHEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
USA v. Juan Sanchez
as 09-20500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN SANCHEZ, also known as Pantera
Sanchez v. Tournament Players Accessories, Inc et al
as 8:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
Juan Sanchez
Defendant:
Tournament Players Accessories, Inc, U.S. Golf Tour, Inc. and Raymond Dumont
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Juan Tincopa-Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70943
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL TINCOPA-SANCHEZ, AKA Juan Sanchez-Tincopa
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Juan Valadez-Sanchez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70761
Petitioner:
JUAN VALADEZ-SANCHEZ, AKA Juan Sanchez-Valadez, AKA Juan Sanchez Valdez, AKA Juan Valdez Sanchez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Sanchez-Morales
as 08-51076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN SANCHEZ-MORALES
Jarrett et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2008cv00923
Plaintiff:
John H. Jarrett and Nathan Jarrett
Defendant:
Michael R. Lewis, Heather A. Younce, Juan Sanchez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
