Cases 11 - 19 of 19
LARSEN v. NELSON et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
JUDGE HUNTER, JUDGE NELSON and JUDGE SOUCY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A LARSEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOHAN v. PICORD et al
as 2:2020cv00268
Defendant:
SANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATT BOCHOE, STACEY NEWTON and others
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY BOHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIMOULAS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00536
Defendant:
JOHN SCHATTINGER, PRINCIPAL, DAVID WALKER, SUPERINTENDENT, MOUNT VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ATHANASIOS DIMOULAS, THELSIA DIMOULAS and ANTONIOS DIMOULAS
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIGUERE v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2019cv00008
Defendant:
JUDGE C DOW, JUDGE SPARACO, JANET T MILLS and others
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Plaintiff:
JODY ANN LEAVITT GIGUERE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. EVERY JUDGE IN MAINE et al
as 1:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
EVERY JUDGE IN MAINE, EVERY DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN MAINE, EVERY POLICE OFFICER IN MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOUCIE v. DUBOIS et al
as 2:2014cv00006
Defendant:
DEBORAH DUBOIS, JUDGE MICHAEL CONTERA and MICHAEL ALFANO
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Plaintiff:
RONALD J SOUCIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. JUDGE WODRUFF et al
as 2:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE WODRUFF, STATE OF MAINE, LINDSAY CARRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RICHES v. FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM et al
as 2:2007cv00124
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM, UNITED STATES FEDERAL JUDGES, UNITED STATES MARSHALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
