Cases 1 - 10 of 53
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT IN STALOWA WOLA, POLAND IN THE MATTER OF ALEKSANDRA OZGA V. ANDRZEJ WILCZEK
as 2:2024cv02288
Not Yet Classified:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT IN STALOWA WOLA, POLAND IN THE MATTER OF ALEKSANDRA OZGA V. ANDRZEJ WILCZEK
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IN CIVIL MATTERS NUMBER 23 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ADRIANA CECILIA BRANCAFORTE V. CHRISTIAN LEDESMA GARCA
as 2:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Not Yet Classified:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IN CIVIL MATTERS NUMBER 23 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ADRIANA CECILIA BRANCAFORTE V. CHRISTIAN LEDESMA GARCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Not Yet Classified:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE MUNICIPAL COURT IN BRNO, CZECH REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
COPELAND et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv23409
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D. and MILDRED JACKSON
Defendant:
JUDGE ANNE THOMPSON, JUDGE FREDA WOLFSON, JUDGE NOEL HILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 28 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NATALIO HUPERT
as 2:2023cv21429
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN CIVIL MATTERS NO. 28 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NATALIO HUPERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
SCHOEMAN et al v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv20699
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN FRANCIS SCHOEMAN and JOYANNE LOUISE SCHOEMAN
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIAL SECURITY UNIT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, JOHANNA BARBA JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
as 2:2023cv17858
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE NO. 84 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ANTONIO RICARDO VILCHES v. LILIANE RAQUEL PETCHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF CIVIL MATTERS NO. 105 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF JOSEFINA COSTAS, ET AL.
as 1:2023cv02136
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF CIVIL MATTERS NO. 105 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF JOSEFINA COSTAS, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE 5TH COURT OF FAMILY IN ISTANBUL, TURKIYE IN THE MATTER OF SANDRA ECE KOSE V. MEHMET KOSE
as 1:2023cv01778
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE 5TH COURT OF FAMILY IN ISTANBUL, TURKIYE IN THE MATTER OF SANDRA ECE KOSE V. MEHMET KOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
REQUEST FOR JUDICIALREQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN LABOR MATTERS NO. 12 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NESTOR GABRIEL HILSENRAT V. MRV COMMUNICATIONS INC.
as 2:2023cv01184
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
In Re:
REQUEST FOR JUDICIALREQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE FIRST INSTANCE COURT IN LABOR MATTERS NO. 12 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN THE MATTER OF NESTOR GABRIEL HILSENRAT V. MRV COMMUNICATIONS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
