Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dale vs. State of North Carolina 26th Judicial District et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Dametri Dale
Defendant:
State of North Carolina 26th Judicial District, Spencer Merriweather, III, Kristen McNeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale v. State of North Carolina 26th Judicial District et al
as 3:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Dametri Dale
Defendant:
State of North Carolina 26th Judicial District, Spencer Merriweather, III, Kathryn Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant:
North Carolina State Board of Elections, Carol Hill Williams, Michael G. Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute and League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00066
Defendant:
xxxxx xxxxx, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Arroyo v. Zamora et al
as 3:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Valerie Arroyo
Defendant:
Daniel J. Zamora, Chad Diamond, North Carolina State Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Regional Postal Inspector et al
as 3:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Regional Postal Inspector, Office of Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Patents and Trademark Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. City of Charlotte, NC et al
as 3:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Riccardo Darnell Jones
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, NC and Judicial District 26
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
