Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Rhodes v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24995
Plaintiff:
Julie Rhodes
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Loudermilk, et al v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 12-17259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, UNKNOWN PARTIES, MICHAEL DANNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE RHODES, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney General for the State of Arizona, RHONDA CASH, individually and in official capacity as a social worker with the Arizona Department of Economic Security, Administration for Children, Youth, Families, Child Protective Services and JENNA CRAMER, individually and in official capacity as a social worker with the Arizona Department of Economic Security, Administration for Children and Families, Child Protective Services
John Loudermilk, et al v. Michael Danner, et al
as 10-15980
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL DANNER, RICHARD GAGNON, JOSHUA RAY and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN LOUDERMILK and TIFFANY LOUDERMILK, individually and as parents and next friends of Brittany Renee Nash, Dakota James Loudermilk, Kristin Grace Loudermilk, Faith Rose Loudermilk, and Montana Vaughn Loudermilk, minor children
Defendant:
JOSEPH ARPAIO, JULIE RHODES, RHONDA CASH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
