Cases 1 - 10 of 13
LEWIS v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2022cv04965
Plaintiff:
SAMMEISO LEONARD LEWIS
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBBS-SQUIRES v. COSBY et al
as 2:2016cv00768
Plaintiff:
M. EUGENE GIBBS-SQUIRES
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY (BILL) COSBY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ABRAMS et al v. THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00638
Plaintiff:
SHERESE ABRAMS
Defendant:
THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN W. PERSON, JR., MARY D. COLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DAVIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
HAROLD DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv04243
Plaintiff:
DENNIS CARTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRIER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY SCOTT
Defendant:
MICHEAL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELT v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 4:2010cv02333
Petitioner:
Tariq L. Belt
Respondent:
Office of Attorney General, Eric Holder, U.s. district court district of maryland branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARDY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv06846
Plaintiff:
KEITH HARDY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv06148
Plaintiff:
TARON COLEMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JOHN DOE, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Hufford et al
as 3:2010cv02331
Petitioner:
Waldemar Morales
Respondent:
T. L. Hufford and U. S. Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
