Cases 1 - 10 of 37
State of California, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-1779
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
State of California, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-1774
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO, in the official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Social Security Administration, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Acting U.S. Attorney General, DEREK T. KAN, in the official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
State of California, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 26-1506
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Interested Party:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, LISA LAWITZKE, Clerk, Bellevue Township, Michigan and others
United States of America v. Cozart
as 26-2284
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS COZART
Harrington v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv02919
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Commissioner Jessica Tisch, Captain James Whitlock and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HANNAN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2025cv00625
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DOUGLAS MICHAEL HANNAN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Unknown:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
State of California, et al v. Trump, et al
as 25-1726
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEVADA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, PAMELA J. BONDI, in the official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL HAAS, Interim Clerk, City of Madison, Wisconsin, BAOKY VU, Former Vice Chair, DeKalb County Board of Elections, Georgia, REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ARIZONA and others
Amicus Curiae:
JIM ALLEN, Director of Elections, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN PARTY, LISA JO BROWN, Clerk and Register of Deeds, Oakland County, Michigan and others
Doe, et al v. Noem, et al
as 25-1384
Plaintiff:
SVITLANA DOE, MAKSYM DOE, MARIA DOE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF BOSTON, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CA, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA and others
Defendant:
KRISTI NOEM, in the official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, PETE R. FLORES, in the official capacity as Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, RODNEY S. SCOTT, in the official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Di Genova, Jr. et al v. Lester et al
as 5:2025cv00215
Defendant:
Jason Lester, Charles Cici, justin douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Di Genova, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
