Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Korthof v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jack Korthof
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thunderhawk et al v. Morton, County of, North Dakota et al
as 1:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Waste'Win Young, Reverend John Floberg, Cissy Thunderhawk and others
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Tigerswan LLC, Superintendent Michael Gerhardt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chappell v. USA
as 1:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Jack Albert Chappell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Eggink v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Daniel Francis Eggink
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Doug Burgum, Jack Dalrymple and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammock v. Dalrymple et al
as 3:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Gail Hammock
Defendant:
Jack Dalrymple, Leann K. Bertsch, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benfiet v. USA
as 1:2016cv00256
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Beau Jack Benfiet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clifford v. Dalrymple et al
as 1:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Clifford
Defendant:
Jack Dalrymple, Leann K. Bertsch, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleck v. McDonald et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Arnold Fleck
Defendant:
Jack McDonald , Aubrey Fiebelkorn-Zuger , Tony Weiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorgensen et al v. Montplaisir et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Janet E. Jorgensen and Cynthia A. Phillips
Defendant:
Michael Montplaisir , Wayne Stenehjem , Ryan Rauschenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsay et al v. Dalrymple et al
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ron Ramsay , Peter Vandervort , Celeste Carlson Allebach and others
Defendant:
Jack Dalrymple , Wayne Stenehjem , Ryan Rauschenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
