Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Gregory Bourke, et al v. Steve Beshear, et al
as 14-5291
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY BOURKE, MICHAEL DELEON, LUTHER BARLOWE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVE BESHEAR, in his official capacity as Governor of Kentucky
Defendant:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Kentucky
Roger Holsey, Jr. v. Jack Conway
as 14-5180
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEE HOLSEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, Attorney General
Jackson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 1:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Matthew Jackson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Jack Conway, Henry Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Bottoms et al
as 3:2013cv01019
Petitioner:
Jeremy Watkins
Respondent:
Don Bottoms and Jack Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin et al v. Breshear et al
as 3:2013cv00946
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Franklin and Tamera Boyd
Defendant:
Steve Breshear , Jack Conway and Sue Carol Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamble v. Conway et al
as 5:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Jack Conway, William Robert Long, Jr., Darren W. Peckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Peckler et al
as 5:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Darren W. Peckler, Joni H. Terry, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Don Bottom, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Conway
as 3:2013cv00916
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyd
Defendant:
Jack Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Luney v. Deborah Hickey, et al
as 13-6137
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTHONY LUNEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Respondent:
JACK CONWAY, for the Commonwealth of Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
