Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Joshua v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv20348
Defendant:
Instagram, Holliness Temple Church International "Holiness Temple", Facebook, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
King Joshua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re Twitter, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2018cv00062
Defendant:
Richard Costolo , Anthony Noto , Jack Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Porter
Consol_plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza and Francis Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vidurek et al v. Koskinen et al
as 7:2017cv09064
Plaintiff:
John Vidurek and Kimberly Vidurek
Defendant:
John Koskinen, Brenda Dial, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidurek et al v. IRS et al
as 1:2017cv07971
Plaintiff:
John Vidurek and Kimberly Vidurek
Defendant:
IRS, John Koskinen, Brenda Dial and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eugene Towers v. Robert Iger, et al
as 17-15770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE F. TOWERS, Derivatively on Behalf of The Walt Disney Company
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. IGER, ALAN BERGMAN, EDWIN CATMULL and others
Fleming v. Costolo, et. al.
as 4:2016cv06492
Plaintiff:
Francis Fleming
Defendant:
Richard Costolo, Anthony Noto, Jack Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Espinoza v. Dorsey et al
as 3:2016cv06457
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Anthony Noto, Peter Fenton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter v. Costolo et al
as 3:2016cv06136
Defendant:
Richard Costolo, Anthony Noto, Jack Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. Dorsey
as 1:2016cv03550
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Towers v. Iger et al
as 5:2015cv04609
Plaintiff:
Eugene F. Towers
Defendant:
Robert A. Iger , Alan Bergman , Edwin Catmull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
