Cases 1 - 10 of 2,092
Jackson et al v. Village of Winnetka
as 1:2024cv03576
Plaintiff:
William Jackson, Kathleen Jackson, Chicago Title and Trust Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Winnetka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Sr. Lawrence L Jackson
Respondent:
Illinois River Correctional Center and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01151
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. J&A Caregivers, LLC
as 1:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jackson
Defendant:
J&A Caregivers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518 Interception of Wire/Oral/Electronic Communication
Jackson v. Markham
as 1:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Sammie Jackson
Defendant:
City of Markham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jackson v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03167
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
The People of the State of Illinois and Cook County States Attorney's Office Criminal Prosecutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jackson v. Gomez et al
as 1:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Rasheem Jackson
Defendant:
. Gomez, . Tate, . Stellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
