Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Red Bear v. Jumper
as 5:2023cv05083
Plaintiff:
Donell Red Bear
Defendant:
Jacob Elijah Jumper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Kent v. Pathward, N.A. et al
as 4:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kent
Defendant:
Pathward, N.A., Ipswitch, Inc and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pretty Sounding Flute v. Fluke et al
as 3:2023cv03026
Petitioner:
Jacob Pretty Sounding Flute
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaPine v. Putnam
as 4:2023cv04031
Counter Defendant:
Jacob J. LaPine
Counter Claimant:
Rodney L. Putnam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jogaak v. Hayley et al
as 4:2022cv04104
Plaintiff:
Jogaak D. Jogaak
Defendant:
Jacob Hayley, Stefanie Schaefer, Alexandria Alsdorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jogaak v. Hayley et al
as 4:2022cv04105
Defendant:
Jogaak D. Jogaak, Jacob Hayley, Stefanie Schaefer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Forman v. Brookings Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv04034
Plaintiff:
Michael Brian Forman
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Joel Perry, Jacob Vukovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Stasa v. Warden - FPC Yankton
as 4:2021cv04112
Petitioner:
Jacob Henry Stasa
Respondent:
Warden - FPC Yankton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lottman v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv04026
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jacob Francis Lottman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
