Cases 1 - 7 of 7
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20760
Plaintiff:
JACOB PIERCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jorge Rivera-Guadalupe v. Jacob Pierce
as 23-1792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JORGE RIVERA-GUADALUPE
Defendant / Appellant:
JACOB PIERCE, in his individual and official capacity as a Detective with the City of Harrisburg, Bureau of Police
Jorge Rivera-Guadalupe v. City of Harrisburg, et al
as 21-1246
Defendant / Appellant:
JACOB PIERCE, in his individual and official capacity as a Detective with the City of Harrisburg, Bureau of Police and CITY OF HARRISBURG, d/b/a Bureau of Police
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL A. SPROW, in his individual and official capacity as the First Assistant District Attorney with the Dauphin County District Attorney's Office
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JORGE RIVERA-GUADALUPE
Jacob Pierce v. Bucky Rowland, et al
as 20-5731
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES JACOB MARBET, Individually and as a correctional officer of the Maury County Sheriff's Office, BETH POSEY, Individually and as a correctional officer of the Maury County Sheriff's Office, MAURY COUNTY, TN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB PIERCE
PIERCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25060
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera-Guadalupe v. City of Harrisburg d/b/a Bureau of Police et al
as 1:2019cv01400
Defendant:
Esq. Michael Sprow, City of Harrsburg d/b/a Bureau of Police, Jacob Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rivera-Guadalupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Rowland et al
as 1:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Pierce
Defendant:
Sheriff Bucky Rowland, Correctional Officer Jacob Wilson, Correctional Officer Jacob Marbet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
