Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Pegues v. Mitchell-Lawshea et al
as 4:2015cv04106
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell-Lawshea, Michael Bednarz, Danielle Walker-Low and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Mitchell-Lawshea et al
as 3:2015cv03114
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes, Ronnie Brazzell, Jeffrey Hargett and others
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell-Lawshea, Michael Bednarz, Danielle Walker-Low and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Richard M. Smego v. Dr. Jacqueline Mitchell
as 15-1629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD M. SMEGO
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE MITCHELL, Doctor, Dentist at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Raymond King v. Steven M. Newbold, et al
as 15-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN M. NEWBOLD, Doctor, LEDEANE K. FATTORE-BRUNO, Doctor, JACQUELINE MITCHELL-LAWSHEA, Doctor and others
Smego v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2014cv08541
Plaintiff:
Richard Smego
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell
Respondent:
Addus Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Lester Dobbey v. Jacqueline Mitchell-Lawshea, et al
as 14-2772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER DOBBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE MITCHELL-LAWSHEA and MICHAEL DANGERFIELD
Parisi v. Hardy et al
as 1:2014cv05886
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthew Parisi
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Ed Butkiewicz, Jeffrey Saffold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karim v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2014cv05090
Plaintiff:
Samuel Karim
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell, Kenneth Brooks, Jeffery Saffold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04203
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Partha Ghosh, Imhotep Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitter v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2014cv00443
Plaintiff:
Gasi Pitter
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell, Dr. Saffold, Dr. Garg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
