Cases
Deshields Jr. v. Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02984
Defendant: Dr. Michael Peter Grant, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Jama Acuff and others
Plaintiff: Deon Deshields Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bottino v. Howard County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff: Dianne Bottino
Defendant: Howard County, Maryland, Warden/Director Margaret M. Chippendale, Warden/Director Jama Acuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Americans with Disabilities Act
Trejo v. Howard County, Maryland et al
as 8:2022cv01066
Plaintiff: William Garcia Trejo
Defendant: Howard County, Maryland, County Exec. Calvin Ball, III, Director Jack Kavanagh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hill v. Acuff
as 1:2021cv01096
Respondent: Warden Jama Acuff
Petitioner: Daniel W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hinton v. Acuff et al
as 1:2021cv00570
Defendant: Ronald Ragland, Jama Acuff, Sgt. Corr. Officer Price and others
Plaintiff: Kenneth Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv00206
Defendant: O. Wayne Hill, Ofc. D. Arndt, Ronnie Peters and others
Plaintiff: Mikel Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. Acuff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv03351
Respondent: Jama Acuff
Petitioner: Dedrick C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton v. Acuff
as 8:2020cv00374
Petitioner: Kenneth Hinton
Respondent: Warden Jama Acuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?