Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kendrick v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv03871
Defendant:
Officer James Hunt, #1442, City Of Chicago and Officer Vincenzo Lupo, #10401
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv04117
Plaintiff:
CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE DEPARMENT and Sherman Jones
Defendant:
James Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Hunt et al
as 1:2019cv04118
Defendant:
James Hunt, CITY OF CHICAGO POLICE DEPARMENT and City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Sherman Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Hunt et al
as 1:2019cv01379
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer Benjamin DeYoung, Star #17199, The City of Chicago, a municipal corporation, Chicago Police Officer James Hunt, Star #11442 and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. HUNT
as 1:2017cv02608
Defendant:
JAMES HUNT
Plaintiff:
RANDOLL DUKE JOHNSON, JR
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hunt
as 3:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Randoll D Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
James Hunt
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Hunt v. Moore Brothers, Inc., et al
as 16-2055
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNT
Appellant:
JANA YOCOM RINE
Defendant - Appellee:
MOORE BROTHERS, INC., WEST RIVER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MIDWEST OPERATIONS and others
Hunt v. Moore Brothers, Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00433
Plaintiff:
James Hunt
Defendant:
Moore Brothers, Inc. , West River Distribution, Inc. , Midwest Operations and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hunt v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
as 1:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jaclyn Hunt and James Hunt
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
