Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Cardoso v. Robinson
as 23-4183
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE JERONIMO CARDOSO
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES ROBINSON, Warden at Pelican Bay State Prison
Garner et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Croteau, Dolores Sheehan, Paul Sheehan and others
Defendant:
A2Z Development Center Inc, Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Joseph William Morales v. James Robinson
as 5:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Joseph William Morales
Respondent:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Anthony Atilano v. James Robinson
as 5:2022cv00504
Petitioner:
Matthew Anthony Atilano
Respondent:
James Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abryel Wilder, et al v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35439
Plaintiff:
PARENT OF Y.C.M.W., PROPERTY OF 32328 7TH AVENUE SW, OWNER OF BURIAL SITE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, TIANNI SHANE HARRISON, et al. and DANIEL SATTERBERG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRYEL MICHOLE-MEENA WILDER
Wilder et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Parent of Y.C.M.W., Property of 32328 7th Avenue SW, Owners of Yah's Knights and Dames and others
Defendant:
Tianni Shane Harrison, Daniel Satterberg and Jay Robert Inslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC)Lopez v. Robinson
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
James Robinson
Petitioner:
Andrew R. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crisco et al v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 3:2019cv07320
Plaintiff:
Patricia Crisco, Dorothy Hughes, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
(HC)Lopez v. Robinson
as 4:2021cv00412
Respondent:
James Robinson
Petitioner:
Andrew R. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
